Yet "ca' canny" is a disastrous thing to the British laborer.It has driven ship-building from England to Scotland, bottle-****** from Scotland to Belgium, flint-glass-****** from England to Germany, and today is steadily driving industry after industry to other countries.A correspondent from Northampton wrote not long ago: "Factories are working half and third time....There is no strike, there is no real labor trouble, but the masters and men are alike suffering from sheer lack of employment.Markets which were once theirs are now American." It would seem that the unfortunate British laborer is 'twixt the devil and the deep sea.If he gives most for least, he faces a frightful slavery such as marked the beginning of the factory system.If he gives least for most, he drives industry away to other countries and has no work at all.
But the union laborers of the United States have nothing of which to boast, while, according to their trade-union ethics, they have a great deal of which to be ashamed.They passionately preach short hours and big wages, the shorter the hours and the bigger the wages the better.Their hatred for a scab is as terrible as the hatred of a patriot for a traitor, of a Christian for a Judas.And in the face of all this, they are as colossal scabs as the United States is a colossal scab.For all of their boasted unions and high labor ideals, they are about the most thoroughgoing scabs on the planet.
Receiving $4.50 per day, because of his proficiency and immense working power, the American laborer has been known to scab upon scabs (so called) who took his place and received only $0.90 per day for a longer day.In this particular instance, five Chinese coolies, working longer hours, gave less value for the price received from their employer than did one American laborer.
It is upon his brother laborers overseas that the American laborer most outrageously scabs.As Mr.Casson has shown, an English nail-maker gets $3 per week, while an American nail-maker gets $30.But the English worker turns out 200 pounds of nails per week, while the American turns out 5500 pounds.If he were as "fair" as his English brother, other things being equal, he would be receiving, at the English worker's rate of pay, $82.50.As it is, he is scabbing upon his English brother to the tune of $79.50 per week.Dr.Schultze-Gaevernitz has shown that a German weaver produces 466 yards of cotton a week at a cost of.303 per yard, while an American weaver produces 1200 yards at a cost of.02 per yard.
But, it may be objected, a great part of this is due to the more improved American machinery.Very true, but none the less a great part is still due to the superior energy, skill, and willingness of the American laborer.The English laborer is faithful to the policy of "ca' canny." He refuses point-blank to get the work out of a machine that the New World scab gets out of a machine.Mr.Maxim, observing a wasteful hand-labor process in his English factory, invented a machine which he proved capable of displacing several men.But workman after workman was put at the machine, and without exception they turned out neither more nor less than a workman turned out by hand.They obeyed the mandate of the union and went easy, while Mr.Maxim gave up in despair.Nor will the British workman run machines at as high speed as the American, nor will he run so many.An American workman will "give equal attention simultaneously to three, four, or six machines or tools, while the British workman is compelled by his trade union to limit his attention to one, so that employment may be given to half a dozen men."But for scabbing, no blame attaches itself anywhere.With rare exceptions, all the people in the world are scabs.The strong, capable workman gets a job and holds it because of his strength and capacity.And he holds it because out of his strength and capacity he gives a better value for his wage than does the weaker and less capable workman.Therefore he is scabbing upon his weaker and less capable brother workman.He is giving more value for the price paid by the employer.
The superior workman scabs upon the inferior workman because he is so constituted and cannot help it.The one, by fortune of birth and upbringing, is strong and capable; the other, by fortune of birth and upbringing, is not so strong nor capable.It is for the same reason that one country scabs upon another.That country which has the good fortune to possess great natural resources, a finer sun and soil, unhampering institutions, and a deft and intelligent labor class and capitalist class is bound to scab upon a country less fortunately situated.It is the good fortune of the United States that is ****** her the colossal scab, just as it is the good fortune of one man to be born with a straight back while his brother is born with a hump.
It is not good to give most for least, not good to be a scab.The word has gained universal opprobrium.On the other hand, to be a non-scab, to give least for most, is universally branded as stingy, selfish, and unchristian-like.So all the world, like the British workman, is 'twixt the devil and the deep sea.It is treason to one's fellows to scab, it is unchristian-like not to scab.
Since to give least for most, and to give most for least, are universally bad, what remains? Equity remains, which is to give like for like, the same for the same, neither more nor less.But this equity, society, as at present constituted, cannot give.It is not in the nature of present-day society for men to give like for like, the same for the same.And so long as men continue to live in this competitive society, struggling tooth and nail with one another for food and shelter, (which is to struggle tooth and nail with one another for life), that long will the scab continue to exist.His will "to live" will force him to exist.He may be flouted and jeered by his brothers, he may be beaten with bricks and clubs by the men who by superior strength and capacity scab upon him as he scabs upon them by longer hours and smaller wages, but through it all he will persist, giving a bit more of most for least than they are giving.
