Good times to you all! Mind if you don't run here for a few days you will go to hence without having had a fore-glimpse of heaven.
MARK.
The play, "Ah Sin," that had done little enough in Washington, was that summer given another trial by Augustin Daly, at the Fifth Avenue Theater, New York, with a fine company.Clemens had undertaken to doctor the play, and it would seem to have had an enthusiastic reception on the opening night.But it was a summer audience, unspoiled by many attractions."Ah Sin" was never a success in the New York season--never a money-maker on the road.
The reference in the first paragraph of the letter that follows is to the Bermuda chapters which Mark Twain was publishing simultaneously in England and America.
ELMIRA, Aug 3,1877.
MY DEAR HOWELLS,--I have mailed one set of the slips to London, and told Bentley you would print Sept.15, in October Atlantic, and he must not print earlier in Temple Bar.Have I got the dates and things right?
I am powerful glad to see that No.1 reads a nation sight better in print than it did in MS.I told Bentley we'd send him the slips, each time, 6weeks before day of publication.We can do that can't we? Two months ahead would be still better I suppose, but I don't know.
"Ah Sin" went a-booming at the Fifth Avenue.The reception of Col.
Sellers was calm compared to it.
*The criticisms were just; the criticisms of the great New York dailies are always just, intelligent, and square and honest--notwithstanding, by a blunder which nobody was seriously to blame for, I was made to say exactly the opposite of this in a newspaper some time ago.Never said it at all, and moreover I never thought it.I could not publicly correct it before the play appeared in New York, because that would look as if I had really said that thing and then was moved by fears for my pocket and my reputation to take it back.But I can correct it now, and shall do it;for now my motives cannot be impugned.When I began this letter, it had not occurred to me to use you in this connection, but it occurs to me now.Your opinion and mine, uttered a year ago, and repeated more than once since, that the candor and ability of the New York critics were beyond question, is a matter which makes it proper enough that I should speak through you at this time.Therefore if you will print this paragraph somewhere, it may remove the impression that I say unjust things which I do not think, merely for the pleasure of talking.
There, now, Can't you say--
"In a letter to Mr.Howells of the Atlantic Monthly, Mark Twain describes the reception of the new comedy 'Ali Sin,' and then goes on to say:" etc.
Beginning at the star with the words, "The criticisms were just." Mrs.
Clemens says, "Don't ask that of Mr.Howells--it will be disagreeable to him." I hadn't thought of it, but I will bet two to one on the correctness of her instinct.We shall see.
Will you cut that paragraph out of this letter and precede it with the remarks suggested (or with better ones,) and send it to the Globe or some other paper? You can't do me a bigger favor; and yet if it is in the least disagreeable, you mustn't think of it.But let me know, right away, for I want to correct this thing before it grows stale again.
I explained myself to only one critic (the World)--the consequence was a noble notice of the play.This one called on me, else I shouldn't have explained myself to him.
I have been putting in a deal of hard work on that play in New York, but it is full of incurable defects.
My old Plunkett family seemed wonderfully coarse and vulgar on the stage, but it was because they were played in such an outrageously and inexcusably coarse way.The Chinaman is killingly funny.I don't know when I have enjoyed anything as much as I did him.The people say there isn't enough of him in the piece.That's a triumph--there'll never be any more of him in it.
John Brougham said, "Read the list of things which the critics have condemned in the piece, and you have unassailable proofs that the play contains all the requirements of success and a long life."That is true.Nearly every time the audience roared I knew it was over something that would be condemned in the morning (justly, too) but must be left in--for low comedies are written for the drawing-room, the kitchen and the stable, and if you cut out the kitchen and the stable the drawing-room can't support the play by itself.
There was as much money in the house the first two nights as in the first ten of Sellers.Haven't heard from the third--I came away.
Yrs ever, MARK.
In a former letter we have seen how Mark Twain, working on a story that was to stand as an example of his best work, and become one of his surest claims to immortality (The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn), displayed little enthusiasm in his undertaking.In the following letter, which relates the conclusion of his detective comedy, we find him at the other extreme, on very tiptoe with enthusiasm over something wholly without literary value or dramatic possibility.One of the hall-marks of genius is the inability to discriminate as to the value of its output."Simon Wheeler, Amateur Detective" was a dreary, absurd, impossible performance, as wild and unconvincing in incident and dialogue as anything out of an asylum could well be.The title which he first chose for it, "Balaam's Ass," was properly in keeping with the general scheme.Yet Mark Twain, still warm with the creative fever, had the fullest faith in it as a work of art and a winner of fortune.It would never see the light of production, of course.We shall see presently that the distinguished playwright, Dion Boucicault, good-naturedly complimented it as being better than "Ahi Sin." One must wonder what that skilled artist really thought, and how he could do even this violence to his conscience.
To W.D.Howells, in Boston:
ELMIRA, Wednesday P.M.(1877)
MY DEAR HOWELLS,--It's finished.I was misled by hurried mis-paging.
