Three momentous things symbolize the era that begins its cycle with the memorable year of 1776: the Declaration of Independence, the steam engine, and Adam Smith's book, "The Wealth of Nations."The Declaration gave birth to a new nation, whose millions of acres of free land were to shift the economic equilibrium of the world; the engine multiplied man's productivity a thousandfold and uprooted in a generation the customs of centuries; the book gave to statesmen a new view of economic affairs and profoundly influenced the course of international trade relations.
The American people, as they faced the approaching age with the experiences of the race behind them, fashioned many of their institutions and laws on British models.This is true to such an extent that the subject of this book, the rise of labor in America, cannot be understood without a preliminary survey of the British industrial system nor even without some reference to the feudal system, of which English society for many centuries bore the marks and to which many relics of tenure and of class and governmental responsibility may be traced.Feudalism was a society in which the status of an individual was fixed: he was underman or overman in a rigid social scale according as he considered his relation to his superiors or to his inferiors.
Whatever movement there was took place horizontally, in the same class or on the same social level.The movement was not vertical, as it so frequently is today, and men did not ordinarily rise above the social level of their birth, never by design, and only perhaps by rare accident or genius.It was a little world of lords and serfs; of knights who graced court and castle, jousted at tournaments, or fought upon the field of battle; and of serfs who toiled in the fields, served in the castle, or, as the retainers of the knight, formed the crude soldiery of medieval days.For their labor and allegiance they were clothed and housed and fed.Yet though there were feast days gay with the color of pageantry and procession, the worker was always in a servile state, an underman dependent upon his master, and sometimes looking upon his condition as little better than slavery.
With the break-up of this rigid system came in England the emancipation of the serf, the rise of the artisan class, and the beginnings of peasant agriculture.That personal gravitation which always draws together men of similar ambitions and tasks now began to work significant changes in the economic order.The peasantry, more or less scattered in the country, found it difficult to unite their powers for redressing their grievances, although there were some peasant revolts of no mean proportions.
But the artisans of the towns were soon grouped into powerful organizations, called guilds, so carefully managed and so well disciplined that they dominated every craft and controlled every detail in every trade.The relation of master to journeyman and apprentice, the wages, hours, quantity, and quality of the output, were all minutely regulated.Merchant guilds, similarly constituted, also prospered.The magnificent guild halls that remain in our day are monuments of the power and splendor of these organizations that made the towns of the later Middle Ages flourishing centers of trade, of handicrafts, and of art.As towns developed, they dealt the final blow to an agricultural system based on feudalism; they became cities of refuge for the runaway serfs, and their charters, insuring political and economic *******, gave them superior advantages for trading.
The guild system of manufacture was gradually replaced by the domestic system.The workman's cottage, standing in its garden, housed the loom and the spinning wheel, and the entire family was engaged in labor at home.But the workman, thus apparently independent, was not the owner of either the raw material or the finished product.A middleman or agent brought him the wool, carried away the cloth, and paid him his hire.Daniel Defoe, who made a tour of Britain in 1794-6, left a picture of rural England in this period, often called the golden age of labor.The land, he says, "was divided into small inclosures from two acres to six or seven each, seldom more; every three or four pieces of land had an house belonging to them,...hardly an house standing out of a speaking distance from another....We could see at every house a tenter, and on almost every tenter a piece of cloth or kersie or shalloon....At every considerable house was a manufactory....Every clothier keeps one horse, at least, to carry his manufactures to the market and every one generally keeps a cow or two or more for his family.By this means the small pieces of inclosed land about each house are occupied, for they scarce sow corn enough to feed their poultry....
